Skip to main content

Defective Road Markings

By GetRighted Legal Research TeamLast updated July 2026

Summary

Traffic restrictions communicated by road markings — bus lane lines, yellow box junction markings, yellow line parking restrictions — must conform to the specifications prescribed by Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 and be adequately maintained under the Highways Act 1980. A restriction that is not adequately marked cannot be fairly enforced. TSRGD Schedule 9 requires bus lane markings to be continuous and clearly visible. The Highways Act 1980, Section 64 places a duty on traffic authorities to maintain traffic signs. Success rate is approximately 55% where markings defects are photographically documented.

Legal Basis

Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, Schedule 9: bus lane markings must be continuous and clearly visible. TSRGD Schedule 7: all road markings must be clearly visible and comply with prescribed specifications. Highways Act 1980, Section 64: the traffic authority has a duty to maintain traffic signs (including road markings). A restriction inadequately marked may not be lawfully enforceable.

When This Defense Applies

This defense applies where road markings indicating a restriction are faded beyond clear legibility, physically absent (gaps in the marking), non-compliant with TSRGD prescribed dimensions or specifications, or obscured by road surface deterioration, tarmac patching, or debris. It is most effective for yellow box junction enforcement (where the box itself is faded) and bus lane enforcement (where the lane markings have deteriorated).

Evidence Required

Document the physical state of the markings:

  • Photos of road markings showing fading, gaps, or physical damage
  • Photos showing markings obscured by road surface deterioration or tarmac patches
  • Comparison with TSRGD prescribed marking specifications (available at legislation.gov.uk)
  • Council maintenance records obtained by FOI request if pursuing a detailed challenge

Win Rate

Approximately 55% success where markings defects are photographically documented. Adjudicators apply a reasonableness standard — markings must be in a condition that would alert a driver of ordinary intelligence to the restriction.

Sources

  1. Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 (SI 2016/362)
  2. Highways Act 1980, Section 64
  3. TSRGD Schedule 9

Frequently Asked Questions

Does every fade count — or do markings need to be very badly worn?
The test is whether a driver of ordinary intelligence would have been adequately informed of the restriction by the markings as they were at the time. Slight fading that leaves the marking clearly legible is unlikely to succeed. Markings so worn that the restriction is uncertain or only partially visible are more defensible.
Can I get the council's maintenance records?
Yes, via a Freedom of Information request to the council. Ask for maintenance inspection records for the road markings at the relevant location and date. If the council has no maintenance records, that is itself evidence of failure to maintain.
Does this apply to yellow lines as well as bus lanes?
Yes. Yellow line parking restrictions are road markings under TSRGD and must be maintained. Faded yellow lines are a defense to parking PCNs. Note that no-waiting lines must be accompanied by any relevant time plates — faded lines and missing plates can be raised together.
What if the markings were fine but it was dark?
Visibility conditions can be relevant. If markings were unlit and conditions made them practically invisible (not merely difficult), that supports the defense. TSRGD has requirements for illumination of certain signs — check whether the marking at issue had any illumination requirement.

Related

Got a ticket? Find out if you can win.

GetRighted checks your situation against all known defenses — free in under 2 minutes.

Check My Ticket