Late Notice to Owner (Traffic PCN)
Summary
The Traffic Management Act 2004, Section 78 imposes strict time limits for serving a Notice to Owner on the registered keeper of a vehicle. For most traffic contraventions the limit is 28 days from the date the keeper's details are obtained from DVLA. For camera-detected contraventions, the Road Traffic (Owner Liability) Regulations 2000 allow 6 months. Service outside these windows is a procedural impropriety that renders the notice unenforceable. Success rate is approximately 80% where late service is evidenced by the postmark.
Legal Basis
Traffic Management Act 2004, Section 78: Notice to Owner must be served within the prescribed period. Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007, Regulation 10: service requirements apply to all civil enforcement. Road Traffic (Owner Liability) Regulations 2000: for camera-detected offences, Notice to Owner may be served within 6 months of the contravention.
When This Defense Applies
This defense applies where the Notice to Owner (NtO) — which is different from the original PCN — was served after the statutory window. The NtO is issued after a Challenge to Notice is rejected, or after the Penalty Charge Notice has not been paid within the initial period. Check the date on the NtO against the contravention date and DVLA keeper disclosure date. Keep the envelope — the postmark is evidence of service date.
How to Check
Work through the timeline:
- ✓Note the date of the original alleged contravention
- ✓Note the date the NtO was received — keep the envelope with postmark
- ✓For non-camera contraventions: NtO must be served within 28 days of DVLA disclosure
- ✓For camera-detected: NtO must be served within 6 months of contravention
- ✓Calculate whether service was within the applicable window
Win Rate
Approximately 80% success where late service is evidenced. Councils sometimes dispute the service date — the postmark on the envelope is the most reliable evidence.
Operator-Specific Patterns
Manchester City Council: High volume enforcement — occasional late service during peak periods. Birmingham City Council: Check postmark carefully — there have been cases where the notice date and postmark date differ.
Sources
- Traffic Management Act 2004, Section 78
- Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007, Regulation 10
- Road Traffic (Owner Liability) Regulations 2000
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the difference between the PCN and the Notice to Owner?
- The PCN (Penalty Charge Notice) is the original notice issued at the vehicle or by post after the contravention. The Notice to Owner is a later document served on the registered keeper when the PCN has not been paid or representations have been rejected. Both have separate time requirements.
- The NtO arrived in the statutory window but the PCN was late — does that matter?
- A late original PCN is separately challengeable under the pcn-served-late defense. These are distinct procedural requirements. If both are late, raise both grounds.
- Can the council prove they posted within time even without my envelope?
- Yes — they may have postal records. However, if you have the envelope with a postmark showing late service, that is strong evidence. Request proof of postage from the council as part of your representations.
- Does this apply outside England?
- The TMA 2004 Part 6 and associated regulations apply in England. Wales has similar provisions. Scotland and Northern Ireland have different frameworks — the time limits and procedures may differ.
Related
Got a ticket? Find out if you can win.
GetRighted checks your situation against all known defenses — free in under 2 minutes.
Check My Ticket